Grading Practices

Grading Practices – part 2 continued

In the last post, I outlined the pros and cons of three grading practices:

A-F, Standards-Based, and Excellent-Satisfactory-Needs Improvement.


This post will finish up by covering the pros and cons of:

Mastery Grading / Pass-Fail / 1-4 / Combinations – Grading Practices

Mastery Grading

The usual practice is to have students stick with a topic, concept, or objective until it is mastered. Mastery means that the student has met the teacher’s criteria. Note that mastery does not have to be 100%. The teacher chooses the cut-off point.
This practice is an excellent way to target a broad range of student abilities. Slow learners are given more time. Fast learners can advance quickly.

Pros

  • The one main advantage is that it allows students of all abilities to succeed

Cons

  • paced curricula can leave those who struggle at a disadvantage
  • Teachers need to keep track of students with varying levels of completion
  • quarterly, semester, or other final grading points can prove troublesome

Pass-Fail

This is a straightforward grading practice system. Whether used for individual assignments or end-term grading, the teacher determines if a student has passed or failed.

Pros

  • Simple to implement the two-part system
  • works well for classes that have subjective material to grade
  • works well for lower-level elementary students

Cons

  • doesn’t work well for core curricula
  • doesn’t work well for standards-based practices
  • ambiguous for setting criteria to determine pass-fail

1-4

This is a numerical version of the A-F system. 4 represents the highest level of achievement and 1 is the lowest level.

Pros

  • easy to implement
  • has a familiarity to it (like the A-F)
  • Typical implementation with college-level classes

Cons

  • You can “split hairs” administering grades
  • What represents failure (1?, <1?)
  • Do you assign grades below 1? (.1-.9)
  • not appropriate for elementary-level
  • not a good fit for middle school

Combinations

Teachers may choose to use one system for some assignments to make grading easier. An example would be using pass-fail for homework. Pass means you did it. Fail means you didn’t. For assessments or weightier work, they may use another system. For instance, for everything else they may apply the A-F, 1-4, Mastery, or another system.

Pros

  • Lesser and greater assignments can be assigned a grade
  • allows for flexibility in grading

Cons

  • can be confusing for teachers and students
  • creates more work for the teacher

Naturally, each system has positive points. Hey, it wouldn’t be used if it didn’t! But, each system has drawbacks.

You may be in a school or district that has the system laid out. Your only recourse is in how you assess the work.

Or, you could be in a school or district that gives you flexibility in how you approach grading.

In either case, you have what you have.

Truthfully, I’m not sure there is a perfect system.

What do you think?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *